The American Idea

The vox populi of modernity is a concept that is employed to illustrate the say of being associated to modernism which, on the separate hand, refers to a pattern of thought that confirms the bias of individuals to construct, enhance, and reform their environment. Further, the profundity project envisions the subject that new contendledge or taking into custody ordure be obtained which en able-bodieds the clearness of perception.Hence, interpreted altogether, modernity in the place setting of the enlightenment enumerates the capacity of kind-hearted beings to establish or reestablish their environment with the study of new wisdom and, more importantly, through the use of their reason or reasonableity. denim Jacques Rousseau argued that the original state of man is superstar which is essenti each(prenominal)y free, or that immunity is primarily humanitys own. Moreover, he banks that freedom has been lost but preempt stock-still be brought back through emancipation .In scathe of modernity and the enlightenment, this emancipation offer be taken back by employ mans rationality in order to clearly perceive what essential be d unity so that individuals nates reform their environment and, in the end, remedy the freedom that they originally pass on. All these nonions stomach be seen in Jose Martis Nuestra the States specifically in the context of how he suggests that the the Statesns should act in order to mold their environment and to eventually build a organisation that is uniquely their own and atomic number 53 that is devoid of outside(prenominal) melodic themes and forms.There atomic number 18 rather s foreveral sharp notions in Nuestra the States by Jose Marti, and all of these notions very hale contribute to the revelation that with vicissitude go intos the smashing(p) possibility of acquiring an identity self-governing as it is from every social occasion else outside. Although much of what is written verifies the idea that the excogitation of a administration of the passel surpasses that which is merely imitated, the role of the extraneous elements provoke be argued as indispensable elements in the foundation of an identity.One of the central themes in Nuestra the States is the idea of the arrangement of the regimen that is characteristic and proper to the the Statesns. Martis argument is grounded on the premise that a regime that is cause according to other landed estates or that which resembles or at least partly incorporates outer elements from foreign republics will not be suitable for the people and for the entire domain. It dope be observed that Marti firmly adheres to the bind of faith of having an identity that is solidly based on what is innate to the people and to the anticipate of the country.What is natural supersedes those that be artificial. And what is essentially natural to the States is smorgasbord in the truest sense of the word. App bently, Marti makes it a point to bridge the issue with multifariousness to that of having a strong government merge according to the innate qualities of the American people. However, it fails to determine the item that diversity as intimately grants the important possibility of not developedly consolidative all the corners of the country into a wholeness and identifiable sphere.What Marti does is to transcend this diversity and plot of land all the differentalbeit intrinsicAmerican elements into a unified concept that most quells, at least in theory, the coerce of other outer featureors. He does this at least in the sense of proposing an ideological battle, sensation that treats ideas far superior than bestial or somatogenic force. Although Marti argues that bloodshed is inevitable, he also suggests that the ideas of man will have to take the core of the battlefront towards the establishment of an independent and unique government and that these ideas should come from the American peop le themselves and not from anybody else.In the fountain part of Martis live on, it can be peakd that he argues that men must unify themselves from the various ranks against the seven-league giant through the force of their ideas since ideas cannot be physically undone. age it is remains feasible that ideas cannot be destroyed in the physical sense and that plot of ground they can significantly proliferate and title the victory of an entire tribe, the role of unmixed physical force in impel such ideas towards certain goals cannot be denied.It should be noted that ideas have to be juxtapose with physical and actual attempts of progressing towards a certain goal which, specifically in the context of Martis Nuestra America, is the humanity of an American government in the strictest sense. By remaining as mere ideas contextualized solely on that rational or thinking part of human existence, ideas can hardly be a revolutionizing tool in altering the unenviable elements with in the golf-club.In another sense, in that location should be the correspondence among such ideas and their physical or actual manifestation (Glennon and Johnson 2006). The absence of such a correspondence whitethorn very well inhibit the ideas from ever reaching the desired outcomes, for what good is a prolific idea that is short of skin senses the actual existence of neighborly problems and the veracity of the clamoring for a physical government? Will ideas alone revolutionize a whole nation without even concretizing these ideas? Apparently, the reply to these questions is a resounding skepticism.History, at the least, tells one that most, if not all, of the changes or alterations in the society have, in one way or another, physical and actual movements which are powerfully fastened to certain beliefs and ideologies (Merrill 1948). For instance, the American regeneration is considered to be founded on political and social ideologies that greatly contribute to the social m ovement during those times where the metaphorical ammunitions for artilleries are ideas that unsex what is being aimed at (Nelson 1965).Wars in Latin America are handlewise potently founded on the correspondence between ideologies and the actual manifestation or enacting of these ideas (Thies 2005). Nevertheless, Marti also recognizes the notion that bloodshed is a strong coefficient of his proposed ideas of the uniting of the American people and the establishment of a government solely their own and from their own.Marti strengthens to solidify his claim by suggesting that those who would seek the authorities of America must focus on and attempt at identifying the reality of the nation and of the peopleof the existing diversity that direly need unificationin order to carry out the idea that the spirit of the government is and so the spirit that is truly derived from America and not from any other (Saldivar 1998).Hence, for those people seeking to identify what is being sugge sted to be place must necessarily have the shrill perception to not only intuitive feeling what is real but to notice and evince the solutions for the reality of the social problems or, at least, of what is intend to be addressed. Otherwise, those who seek to eliminate the external or foreign elements seeping into American thoughts will utterly fail for omit of the capacity to transcend the blurring of the mind and of particular thinking.Such an attempt to identify the reality of the nation and of the people reinforces the idea that the intermit and equal individuals to achieve such feat are those who are accustomed to Americaand on that point can be no conk out person who does not only know much of America but acts and feels like America than the American. This goes to show that the foreigner cannot but feel the American reality, or that the foreign elements cannot entirely suffice to define the American experience although in some parts it whitethorn have some social occasion to do with it.Nevertheless, Martis Nuestra America clearly emphasizes the authors strong attachment, at least in terms of the content of the literature, with the clamoring for a pure American nation, a nation that is founded on American elements. Yet what is middleman rough Martis Nuestra America is the fact that it proposes for a unified government able to identify the reality of the nation, a unified government that is nonetheless rooted on a wide array of individuals or on a, roughly speaking, diversified society.It is and then a widely held idea that the dwell of America is various (Sullivan 1973), and that this entails the notion that a unification of all the recognized and unacknowledged sectors of the nations is a monumental task. While Marti champions his trust that foreign ideas and forms have caused the delay in the rising of a logical construction of a government of America, he fails to note that the very diversity of America also has a role in such a dela y.What he does in the article is to espouse the idea that such diversity can be committed towards the creation of a unique government and a unified people and to set deflection or, at least, subtly put his detainment off the lingering argument that this diversity may in fact be the one which will hinder the creation of an American government bereft of merchandise ideas and forms.Although subjective forcesforces not to be special in the military sensecan keep at bay impending external or foreign forces from launching the layer that separates what is pure from what is alien, these identical midland forces have a connection with the external forces in one way or another. Part of the evidence to this can be rooted from the argument that thither is no such thing as a pure extend that is distinct from the rest of the races since all of mankind emerged from a individual ancestry otherwise known as Homo sapiens (McBrearty 1990).With the idea that all of humanity came from a singl e reap of ancestry, by definition in that location can be no such thing as race and that the demarcation between the American race and the other races is dissolved. Technically, it may be true that mankind belongs to the same ancestry. Practically, there are staggering realities that in the long run create a wide seat between socially constructed races or equivalents thereof.Hence, although Jose Marti real claims that there is no such thing as hatred for the other races because there are no races, he actually argues in Nuestra America that the people should consider the past, family and ancestral roots of the Americans and do international with what can be termed as colonial inheritance for it entails things that are corrupt and defunct. By criticizing the Parisians or Madrileos, Marti actually draws the form between what is American from what is not.And in doing so, it cannot be avoided that Nuestra America in essence may contribute to the enlargement of the space that div ides America from the trade ideas and forms and, thus, the treatment of these foreign entities as others. Martis work also appears to stand for that America is indeed its own, and that what belongs to others is theirs as well which brings us back to what Martis work purports to address yet fails to meetthat there is no hatred among races because there is no such thing as race.Ironically, duration Nuestra America echoes the clamoring for a unique government that is purely American by vanquishing the foreign or trade ideas that are imbibed into the society, it also establishes the idea of separating what is American from what is not if indeed a musical interval can ever be achieved at all, if not physically, at least ideologically. The fact that America and its people are diverse is a compelling reason to come to the idea that the rest of America can hardly a government wrought into a single, unified entity where opposition is inexistent or kept at a teachable level.Moreover, cultural relativism proclaims the idea that several determine such as ethical set of rightness or wrongness may actually vary from culture to culture, and that cultural supremacy or the superiority of one culture from the other relatively varies as well on certain cultural perspectives (Schmidt 1955). From this, one can observe that Martis article conveys the idea that, by excluding anything that is foreign to the system of ideas of the American population, the American ideals are preferred over the foreign ones.Although there is no explicit mentioning that American ideals are far off better than trade ideas, by embracing American ideas in the formation of a unique government one actually albeit subliminally pursues the underlying assumption that what is native is more preferred since it applies better and fitting to the contextual nature of America and, therefore, is superior over the rest at least when put into the context of the formation of a unique government.Interestingl y, cultural relativism tells us otherwise. The American attempt to furnish for themselves a unique government excludes the assumption that merchandise ideas may also serve a contributive purpose in clash such an end in shift for defunct native ideas.While Nuestra America purports to assert for an American identity through its government and purely American ideas while line foreign elements away from such a glaring feat, it also substantiates on the dissertation of using the American diversity as a means towards unifying the whole, liquify them altogether into a single native label called America without discussing much about the weakening force such a diversity may take with it.Nevertheless, Jose Marti nails the all important(p) point in his workthe great significance of ideas in the advancement of an American identityby taking circumstance the role of ideas in revolutionizing a nation flustered with unfamiliar or imported ideas. While it may be the fictional character that ideas without corresponding actions are like vehicles without wheels, it sure enough is the case that actions without ideas are like ruby-red storms which display their destructive might while leaving debris and rubbish subsequently the winds and heavy rains abate.